----------------------- REVIEW 1 --------------------- No comments given ----------------------- REVIEW 2 --------------------- 1) What do the author mean by "one-of-a-kind prediction method" (in Abstract)? ANS -- Changed the term and gave clarity 2) In the Literature review section, there is an uncommon way to present a related approach. ANS -- 1st paragraph correction done. 3) Regarding the methodology, there are some points that should be clarified: ANS - Yes emotions are classified after work. 4) The experimental part should be improved, both in presenting and analysing the obtained results. ANS-- Yes other statistical measures were added (TP,TN,FP,FN) 5) The last sentence from Section VII - there is a typo "Generative (adversarial networks)", not "Generalized (adversarial networks)". ANS - Proof reading suggestion & English correction done. ----------------------- REVIEW 3 --------------------- The article is nicely written, and the work is worth being published. But it has to be rewritten, as at this point it is very negligently set up. ANS -- We have rewritten all possible point to increase the standards We taken care SECTIONS, FIGURES, TABLES, NUMBERS as per the reviewer comments. | 
